Principal Social and Environmental, Economic Performance Indicators
Ibase Table – December 2008
(values in R$ thousands)| 1 – Calculation Base | |
| Net Income (NI) | 10,442,018 |
| Operating Income (OI) | (692,119) |
| Gross Payroll (GP) | 8,579,157 |
| 2 – Internal Social Indicators | Value | % of GP | % of NI |
| Meals | 513,945 | 5.99% | 4.92% |
| Mandatory Social Payments | 1,396,817 | 16.28% | 13.38% |
| Private Pension Plans | 93,532 | 1.09% | 0.90% |
| Health Care | 215,689 | 2.51% | 2.07% |
| Workers’ Health and Safety | 58,446 | 0.68% | 0.56% |
| Education | 22,343 | 0.26% | 0.21% |
| Transportation | 45,974 | 0.54% | 0.44% |
| Professional Development and Training | 102,688 | 1.20% | 0.98% |
| Daycare and Childcare Assistance | 25,241 | 0.29% | 0.24% |
| Profit Sharing | 1,427,581 | 16.64% | 13.67% |
| Other Benefits | 87,883 | 1.02% | 0.84% |
| Total | 3.990,139 | 46.51% | 38.21% |
| 3 - External Social Indicators | Value | % of OR | % of NI |
| Education | 52,276 | 7.55% | 0.50% |
| Culture | 35,747 | 5.16% | 0.34% |
| Health and Sanitation | 2,418 | 0.35% | 0.02% |
| Sports | 3,155 | 0.46% | 0.00% |
| Daycare | - | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meals | - | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Other | 63,220 | 9.13% | 0.61% |
| Total Contributions to Society | 156,817 | 22.66% | 1.50% |
| Taxes (not including social security charges)) | 7,638,870 | 1,103.69% | 73.16% |
| Total | 7,795,687 | 1,126.35% | 74.66% |
| 4 – Environmental Indicators | Value | % of OI | % of NI |
| Related to operations | 18,279 | 2.64% | 0.18% |
| In programs and/or outside projects | 8,444 | 1.22% | 0.08% |
| Total | 26,723 | 3.86% | 0.26% |
| 5 – Personnel Indicators | |
| Nr. Employees at end of period | 108,027 |
| Nr. Employees hired during the period | 24,899 |
| Nr. Outsourced workers | n/a |
| Nr. Interns | 1,350 |
| Nr. Employees aged over 45 | 13,834 |
| Nr. Female employees | 61,326 |
| % Managerial posts held by women | 39.46% |
| Nr. African-Brazilian employees | 14,968 |
| % Managerial posts held by blacks | 5.08% |
| Nr. Special needs employees | 2,736 |
| 6 – Selected Measures of Corporate Social Responsibility | 2008 | Goals 2009 |
| Ratio of highest to lowest salary | n/a | n/a |
| Work-related accidents | n/a | n/a |
| Social and environmental projects were established by: | Executive Directors and Managers | Executive Directors and Managers |
| Standards of occupational safety and health were set by: | Executive Directors and Managers | Executive Directors and Managers |
| Regarding freedom to unionize, collective bargaining and internal worker representation among workers, the Company: | Follows ILO rules | Follows ILO rules |
| Private pension plans for: | All employees | All employees |
| Profit-sharing plans for: | All employees | All employees |
| Requirement that suppliers share Itaú’s ethical and social/environmental responsibility standards: |
Mandatory | Mandatory |
| For staff members to perform volunteer work, the company: | Organizes and encourages | Organizes and encourages |
| Value-added statement (DVA) | 2008 | ||
| Value added to be distributed (in R$) thousands | 25,191,808 | ||
| % | in R$ thousands | ||
| Distribution of value-added | Taxes | 34.43% | 8,672,917 |
| Payroll | 31.52% | 7,941,480 | |
| Stockholders | 12.72% | 3,205,181 | |
| Reinvested Profits | 19.31 % | 4,598,302 | |
| Third Parties | 2.02% | 507,539 | |
About this Report
The 2008 Annual Sustainability Report of Itaú Unibanco follows the guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Brazilian Association of Public Companies (Abrasca). This requires the reporting of its social, environmental and financial performance. This Report also presents initiatives related to the 10 Principles of the Global Compact. All actions undertaken in 2008 to promote the Compact are listed in the GRI cross-index.
The principles most important to the quality of a sustainability report are the inclusion of stakeholders and materiality, i.e. the discussion of topics and issues essential to the operation of the company and to society. The Itaú Unibanco Annual Sustainability Report undertook key procedures to meet these conditions.
In October 2008 Itaú held two consultative sessions with a total of 62 representatives of strategic groups within the bank. In the first of these, a group of employees pointed out what they saw as the most important issues to be addressed in the report. The second stage was a panel of stakeholders which included the participation of employees from various areas of the organization, as well as customers, suppliers and representatives of NGOs and other financial sector institutions. This group was asked to provide a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the bank’s report from the previous year, emphasizing its best aspects. The results of these sessions were assembled by specialist firm BSD Consulting, which presented Itaú with a materiality matrix, showing the main topics which ought to be covered.
Three other studies helped determine the priorities for this Report. UK firm SustainAbility, in partnership with the Brazilian Foundation for Sustainable Development, performed the first assessment of sustainability reports produced in Brazil. At the same time, Unibanco conducted a benchmarking study on the reporting practices of the financial industry in Brazil and abroad.
The comparison of the results of the stakeholder meetings with the findings from the sustainability reports studies was consolidated and subsequently sent to a group of experts from the market, academia, and from social and environmental organizations. This group named which subjects, among the initial group, should be given priority for publication.
This process of developing the content has resulted in the publication of Essence of Sustainability, which outlines Itaú Unibanco’s main challenges and priorities in the area of sustainability. The printed Report also seeks to address these issues in its many chapters, relating the bank’s performance to those issues identified as material.
Comments on this Report can be sent to sustentabilidade@itau.com.br or to sustentabilidade@unibanco.com.br.
10 Principles of the Global Compact
Human Rights
- 1.Support and respect proclaimed human rights
- 2.Make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses
Labour Standards
- 3.Uphold the freedom of association
- 4.Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labour
- 5.Abolition of child labour
- 6.Elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation
Environment
- 7.Support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges
- 8.Promote greater environmental responsibility
- 9.Diffuse environmentally friendly technologies
Anti-Corruption
- 10.Businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery
Global Reporting Initiative Cross Index and
Correlation with the Global Compact
| General Indicators | Global Compact Principle | Where to look |
| Strategy and analysis | ||
| 1.1. Message from the President and Chairman of the Board | 1, 2 | |
| 1.2. Impacts, risks and opportunities | 1 | |
| Organizational Profile | ||
| 2.1. Name of reporting organization | 1 | |
| 2.2. Primary brands, products, and/or services | 1 | |
| 2.3. Operational Structure | 1 | |
| 2.4. Location of organization headquarters | 1 | |
| 2.5. Countries where the organization operates | 1 | |
| 2.6. Nature of ownership and legal form | 1 | |
| 2.7. Markets served | 1 | |
| 2.8. Scale of the reporting organization | 1 | |
| 2.9. Changes during the reporting period | 1 | |
| 2.10. Awards received in the reporting period | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | |
| Report Parameters | ||
| Report Profile | ||
| 3.1. Reporting period | 1 | |
| 3.2. Date of most recent previous report | 1 | |
| 3.3. Reporting cycle | 1 | |
| 3.4. Contact point for questions regarding the report or its contents | 1 | |
| Report Scope and Boundary | ||
| 3.5. Process for defining report content | 1 | |
| 3.6. Boundary of the report | 1 | |
| 3.7. Limitations on the scope or boundary of the report | 1 | |
| 3.8. Basis for reporting | 1 | |
| 3.9. Data measurement techniques and the bases of calculations of Itaú and Unibanco | Consolidated quantitative Itaú and Unibanco indicators January to December, 2008 | |
| 3.10. Explanation of the effect of any re-statements of information provided in earlier reports | In their own tables | |
| 3.11. Significant changes from previous reporting periods | 1 | |
| GRI Content Index | ||
| 3.12. GRI Summary | 1 | |
| Assurance | ||
| 3.13. External assurance | Independent auditor’s limited assurance report, 1, AA1000 Assurance Statement, 2 | |
| Governance, Commitments, and Engagement | ||
| Governance | ||
| 4.1. Governance structure of the organization | 1 | |
| 4.2. Executive officers | 1 | |
| 4.3. Independent and/or non-executive Directors | 1 | |
| 4.4.Mechanisms for shareholders and employees to provide recommendations or direction to Board | 1, 2 | |
| 4.5. Linkage between compensation for Board members, senior managers and executives and the organization’s performance | Note 16 to the Financial Statements –Volume 2: 1 | |
| 4.6. Processes in place for Board to ensure conflicts of interest are avoided | 1 | |
| 4.7. Process for determining the qualifications and expertise of Directors | 1 | |
| 4.8. Statements of mission, values, codes of conduct and principles relevant to economic, environmental and social performance plus status of their implementation | 1 The Itaú Unibanco Vision and Mission are in progress |
|
| 4.9. Procedures of the Board of Directors | 1 | |
| 4.10. Processes for evaluating Board performance | Based on best corporate governance practices recommended by the Brazilian Corporate Governance Institute (IBGC) and by the Brazilian Securities Commission (CVM), three years ago the Board of Directors implemented its annual self-evaluation | |
| Commitments to External Initiatives | ||
| 4.11. Whether and how the precautionary approach or principle is addressed | 1 | |
| 4.12. Externally developed economic, environmental and social charters, principles or other initiatives | 1 | |
| 4.13. Memberships in associations | 1 | |
| Stakeholder Engagement | ||
| 4.14. List of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization | 1 | |
| 4.15. Basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage | 1 | |
| 4.16. Approaches to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group | 1 | |
| 4.17. Key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement | 1, 2, Essence of Sustainability | |
| Economic Performance Indicators | ||
| ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE | ||
| Form of management | 1 | |
| EC.1 Direct economic value generated and distributed | Ibase Table | |
| EC.2 Financial risks and opportunities related to climate change | 7 | 1, 2 |
| EC.3 Pension Plan | Note 16 to the Financial Statements 1 | |
| EC.4 Financial assistance received from the government | Note 16 to the Financial Statements 1 | |
| Market Presence | ||
| EC.5 Ratio between lowest salary and local minimum salary | 1 | |
| EC.6 Policy, practices and spending on locally-based suppliers | 1 | |
| EC.7 Procedures for local hiring | 1 | |
| Indirect Economic Impacts | ||
| EC.8 Development and impact of infrastructure investments | 1 | |
| EC.9 Indirect economic impacts | Itaú Unibanco has no studies to measure these impacts | |
| ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE | 1 | |
| Form of management | ||
| Materials | ||
| EN1. Materials | 8 | 1 |
| EN2. Percentage of materials used that are recycled | 8 snd 9 | 1 |
| Energy | ||
| EN3. Direct energy consumption | 8 | 1 |
| EN4. Indirect energy consumption |
8 |
1 |
| EN5. Energy saved due to conservation and efficiency improvements | 8 and 9 | 1 |
| EN6. Energy efficient or renewable energy based products and services | 8 and 9 | 1 |
| EN7. Initiatives to reduce indirect energy consumption and reductions achieved | 8 and 9 | 1 |
| Water | ||
| EN8. Total water withdrawal by source | 8 | 1 |
| EN9. Water sources affected by withdrawal of water | 8 | none |
| EN10. Water recycled and reused | 8 and 9 | 1 |
| Biodiversity | ||
| EN11. Protected and high biodiversity areas | 8 | None, as the bank’s operations are centred in urban areas |
| EN12. Impacts on biodiversity | 8 | None, as the bank’s operations are centred in urban areas |
| EN13. Habitats protected or restored | 8 | None, as the bank’s operations are centred in urban areas |
| EN14. Management of impacts on biodiversity | 8 | None, as the bank’s operations are centred in urban areas |
| EN15. IUCN Red List species | 8 | None, as the bank’s operations are centred in urban areas |
| Emissions, effluents, and Wast | 8 | |
| EN16. Direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases | 8 | 1 |
| EN17. Other indirect emissions of greenhouse gases | 1 | |
| EN18. Initiatives to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases | 7, 8 and 9 | 1, 2 |
| EN19. Emissions of substances harmful to the ozone layer | 8 | 1 |
| EN20. NOx, SOx and other emissions | 8 | 1 |
| EN21. Total water discharge | 8 | Discharged water is only from domestic utility and collected rainwater |
| EN22. Total weight of waste by type and disposal method | 8 | 1 |
| EN23. Total weight and volume of significant spills | 8 | None, as Itaú Unibanco’s activities have no significant use of chemical, oil or flammable substances |
| EN24. Hazardous waste transported | 8 | Waste generated by Itaú Unibanco is properly removed and handled by third-parties. Quantities appear in EN22. Systems do not record weights |
| EN25. Water bodies and habitats affected | 8 | Itaú Unibanco does not significantly affect water bodies or habitats through discharge or drainage by generating only domestic effluents |
| Products and Services | ||
| EN26. Mitigation of impacts of products and services | 7, 8 and 9 | 1, 2 |
| EN27. Percentage of products sold and their packaging materials reclaimed | 8 and 9 | 1 |
| Compliance | ||
| EN28. Monetary value of significant fines | 8 | None |
| Transport | ||
| EN29. Impacts of transporting products and other goods and materials | 8 | 1 |
| Overall | ||
| EN30. Total environmental protection expenditures and investments | 7, 8 and 9 | 1 |
| SOCIAL PERFORMANCE – LABOUR PRACTICES AND DECENT WORK | ||
| Form of management | 1 | |
| Employment | ||
| LA.1 Total workforce by employment type and region | 1 | |
| LA.2 Total number and rate of employee turnover | 6 | 1 |
| LA.3 Benefits provided to full-time employees | 1 | |
| Labour/Management Relations | ||
| LA.4 Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements | 1 and 3 | 1 |
| LA5. Minimum period for notification in advance of operational changes | 3 | Itaú and Unibanco collective agreements with staff have no minimum period for announcing significant operational changes |
| Occupational Health and Safety | ||
| LA6. Percentage of total workforce represented in joint management/worker health and safety committees | 1 and 3 | 1 |
| LA7. Rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days and absenteeism, and work-related fatalities | 1 | No deaths in 2008 |
| LA8. Programs regarding serious diseases | 1 | 1 |
| LA9. Health and safety topics in agreements with unions | 1 | 1 |
| Training and education | ||
| LA10. Hours of training | 6 | 1 |
| LA11. Programs for skills management and continuous learning | 1 | |
| LA12. Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews | 1 | |
| Diversity and equal opportunities | ||
| LA13. Composition of governance bodies and workforce | 1 and 6 | 1 |
| LA14. Ratio of basic salary of men to women by employee category | 1 and 6 | 1 |
| SOCIAL PERFORMANCE - HUMAN RIGHTS | ||
| Form of Management | 1 | |
| Investment and Procurement Practices | ||
| HR1. Percentage and total number of investment agreements with human rights clauses/screening | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
Unibanco signed 22 BNDES on-lending contracts and two IFC on-lending contracts that have human rights clauses |
| HR2. Percentage of suppliers evaluated for human rights and actions taken | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
1 |
| HR3. Hours of human rights training for employees on human rights | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
1 |
| Non-discrimination | ||
| HR4. Cases of discrimination | 1, 2 and 6 | Nine discrimination cases were filed in 2008 |
| Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining | ||
| HR5. Operations where freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at risk | 1, 2 and 3 | 1 |
| Child Labour | ||
| HR6. Operations with risk of child labour | 1, 2 and 5 | 1 |
| Compulsory and Slave Labour | ||
| HR7. Operations with risk of forced or compulsory labour | 1, 2 and 4 | 1 |
| Security Practices | ||
| HR8. Security personnel trained in human rights | 1 and 2 | 1 |
| Indigenous rights | ||
| HR9. Violations of indigenous rights | 1 and 2 | none |
| SOCIAL PERFORMANCE – SOCIETY | ||
| Form of management | 1, 2 | |
| Community | ||
| SO1. Managing impacts of operations on communities | Although it has no studies to manage its impact on communities, Itaú Unibanco has developed community-focused practices | |
| Corruption | ||
| SO2. Assessments of risks related to corruption | 10 | 1 |
| SO3. Training in anti-corruption policies | 10 | 1 |
| SO4. Measures taken in response to cases of corruption | 10 | 1 |
| Public Policies | ||
| SO5. Participation in public policy development and lobbying | 1 and 5 | 1 |
| SO6. Contributions to political parties | 10 | Meetings and donations provided by Itaú and Unibanco in 2008 are available at www.tse.gov.br |
| Anti-Competitive Behaviour | ||
| SO7. Legal actions for anti-competitive behaviour, anti-trust and monopoly practices | none | |
| Compliance | ||
| SO8. Fines and penalties for non-monetary non-compliance with laws and regulations | R$ 2,687,762 | |
| SOCIAL PERFORMANCE – PRODUCT REPSONSIBILITY | ||
| Form of management | 1 | |
| Customer Health and Safety | ||
| PR1. Assessment of impacts | 1, 2 | |
| PR2. Non-compliance with the voluntary codes | n/a | |
| Product and Service Labelling | ||
| PR3. Procedures for products and services labelling | 1 | |
| PR4. Non-compliance | n/a | |
| PR5. Practices related to customer satisfaction | 1 | |
| Communication and Marketing | ||
| PR6. Adherence to laws, standards and codes | The bank follows the Corporate Ethics Code, ISO manuals plus Conar, Abemd and CDC rules. Direct marketing and merchandising materials developed by Unibanco are subject to applicable rules from Bacen, Anbid and other financial sector regulatory bodies | |
| PR7. Non-compliance | none | |
| Customer Privacy | ||
| PR8. Violation of customer privacy | 1 | n/a |
| Compliance | ||
| PR9. Fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning provision and use of products and services | R$ 2,385,738 |
| Financial Services Sector Performance Indicators | ||
| Product Portfolio | FS1. Socio-environmental policies | 1, 2 |
| FS2. Socio-environmental risk assessment | 1 | |
| FS3. Socio-environmental monitoring of client | 1 | |
| FS4. Training in socio-environmental policies | 1 | |
| FS5. Interactions on socio-environmental risks/opportunities | 1 | |
| Financial Services | ||
| Product Portfolio | FS6. Percentage of portfolio of business lines | Note 8 to the Financial Statements – 1 |
| FS7. Products and services for social benefit | 1, 2 | |
| FS8. Products and services for environmental benefit | 1, 2 | |
| Financial Services | ||
| Product Portfolio | FS9. Socio-environmental policies audits | 1 |
| FS10. Interaction with companies on socio-environmental issues | 1 | |
| FS11. Assets subject to socio-environmental screening | 1 | |
| FS12. Voting policies applied to socio-environmental issues | 1 | |
| Society | ||
| Community | FS13. Access in areas of economic disadvantage | 1 |
| Community | FS14. Access for people with disabilities | 1 |
| Products | ||
| Labelling of products and services | FS15. Development and sale of products and services | 1 |
| Labelling of products and services | FS16. Financial education | 1 |
Independent Auditor’s Limited Assurance Report
To the Management of Itaú Unibanco Banco Múltiplo S.A.
Introduction
We were retained to conduct a limited assurance report of the 2008 Itaú Unibanco Sustainability Report of Itaú Unibanco Banco Múltiplo S.A., which was prepared under the responsibility of Bank management, following the criteria appearing in paragraph 3. This work included the design, implementation and maintenance of internal controls for the suitable creation and presentation of the 2008 Sustainability Report and the appropriate application of this criteria. Our responsibility is to issue a limited assurance of the information presented in the Itaú Unibanco Sustainability Report of Itaú Unibanco Banco Múltiplo S.A. for the year 2008.
Procedures used
Our limited assurance work was carried out pursuant to Assurance Procedures and Rules – NPO-01, as issued by the Brazilian Institute of Independent Auditors (Ibracon), and included: (i) the planning of the work, based on the relevance and amount of information presented in the Itaú Unibanco Sustainability Report of Itaú Unibanco Banco Múltiplo S.A.; (ii) gaining an understanding of the internal controls; (iii) the demonstration, based on tests, of the evidence supporting the quantitative and qualitative data of the Sustainability Report; (iv) interviewing the managers responsible; and (v) comparing information of a financial nature with the accounting books. This allowed the procedures applied to be considered sufficient to provide a level of limited assurance, and consequently, did not require the issuance of a broader report under the Assurance Procedures and Rules – NPO-01.
Scope and limits
The goals of our work were to check and assess the data contained in the Bank’s Sustainability Report, which included obtaining qualitative information, measuring and calculating quantitative data, and presenting this in compliance with the following criteria: (i) Brazilian Accounting Standard NBC T 15 - Information of a Social and Environmental Nature; and (ii) Global Reporting Initiative (GRI G3) reporting guidelines for sustainability reports. Opinions and historic and descriptive information were not subject to subjective evaluation are not within the scope of the work carried out.
Conclusion
Based on our review, we have no knowledge of any material change arising from the information contained in the Sustainability Report of Itaú Unibanco Banco Múltiplo S.A., relative to the year ended December 31, 2008. The information herein is presented appropriately in all material respects in compliance with the criteria described in paragraph 3.
São Paulo, March 31, 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Auditores Independentes
CRC 2SP000160/O-5
Emerson Laerte da Silva
Contador CRC 1SP171089/O-3
AA1000 Assurance Statement
1. Objective
Banco Itaú Holding Financeira S/A retained BSD Consulting to independently audit the process of creating its 2008 Sustainability Report and the process of engaging its stakeholders. BSD conducted its work in compliance with the AA1000 Assurance Standard 2008. The objective of the process is to check and provide Itaú stakeholders with an independent opinion on the quality of the report, the underlying sustainability management processes and compliance with the AA1000 principles.
2. Independence
BSD is a company which specializes in sustainability. We operate independently, and no BSD employee has any professional consulting relationship with Itaú Holding or any of its related companies, in addition to work involving material information with internal and external stakeholders. Our work was overseen by a qualified professional under Rule AA1000AS of the International Register of Certified Auditors, under registration number 1189266.
3. Scope and limits
The scope of this Assurance Statement includes the operations of Banco Itaú, its respective business areas and the operations of Banco Itaú BBA, and covers the activities from March 2008 to February 2009, with the bank’s second engagement cycle. The scope does not include the operations of Unibanco, whose information appears in the report. The level of assurance is moderated based on the definition of AA1000AS. BSD did not carry out any assessment of the reliability of the data.
4. Methodology
The process of evaluating the management process and the report was based on two main tools, which reflect the models applied by the company:
- A)
- To measure the progress of the company’s sustainability report we used the Relata® tools, developed by BSD, which have allowed us to make ongoing assessments of the Itaú Holding Financeira S.A. Annual and Social Reports since 2005. The three tools in the Relata® family comprise three analytical pillars of
this report:
- The “Relata®” tool allows a team of BSD specialists to assess the performance of the report.
- The “Relata GRI®” tool makes a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the report by using software developed by BSD, resulting in a GRI Indicators compliance ratio, in the G3 version.
- The “Relata Stakeholders” tool analyzes the Bank’s report by representatives of the strategic relationship groups.
- B)
- Our analysis of the process of sustainability management follows AA1000AS 2008 guidelines (AccountAbility 1000 Assurance Standard 2008) type 1, which covers the evaluation of the compliance with the three Principals of AA1000AS: Inclusion, Materiality and Response Capacity. The execution of this task is continual and consists of the monitoring and implementation of the AA1000 management process together with the team responsible, in checking the internal documents and in creating sample tests of the material issues addressed in the engagement process through interviews with different stakeholders.
Main Conclusions
A) Progress in the sustainability report process
Since the 2006 report BSD has measured compliance with the new GRI version, G3. With the 2006 and 2007 reports, Banco Itaú Holding Financeira S.A. showed significant progress in complying with GRI criteria, as shown in the Relata G3® indices.

Based on the analysis of BSD’s specialist team, the bank has made major strides in its ability to respond to the demands of the leading international model for sustainability reports, responding gradually to a larger number of indicators and demonstrating greater compliance with the principles established by the GRI. However, the note below from the evaluation of the 2007 report, using Relata®, reflects a lack of clarity and presentation of information, as well as a lack of environmental data, which has been corrected in this version of the report.
B) Monitoring the AA1000 dialogue process with stakeholders
In the opinion of BSD, Banco Itaú improved its process of sustainability management and engagement of stakeholders, demonstrating the achievement of actions and a commitment to consolidate the process and evolve continuously. The main findings of the monitoring of the implementation of the AA1000 standard are grouped in relation to prevailing principles of AA1000S: Inclusion, Materiality and Response Capacity.
Inclusion
This principle addresses the organization’s commitment to enable the participation of stakeholders in identifying critical issues and the search for viable solutions within the context of sustainability, such as the inclusion of sustainability impacts arising from the business of the company.
In 2008, the reporting period, the bank was in the second cycle of incorporating the AA1000 standard, implementing a number of engagement practices. The main result of this period was the establishment of an engagement structure with forms of engagement with all priority stakeholders and an improved measurement and control system.
The main processes observed by the auditor during the period were:
- compliance with the SA8000 standard at Ceic (Itaú Conceição Business Centre);
- selection and engagement of suppliers;
- evaluation process and implementation of the Ethics Policy;
- compliance with the new customer service rules at the call centres;
- implementation of socio-environmental policy for credit;
- engagement process for security service providers;
- Speak Frankly; and
- meetings with shareholders.
We found that the goals and commitments made by Itaú were achieved, and that processes were carefully conducted, improving the skills needed to perform the management tasks. The activities are in line with Itaú Unibanco’s new Sustainability Policy, prepared at the end of 2008. All processes will be accompanied by an integrated array of indicators. We recommend that stakeholders have a greater say in the formulation of indicators, strengthening the forms of engagement with external parties that go beyond relationship events, migrating to more strategic forms of inclusion.
Materiality
The concept of materiality, within the context of reporting non-financial indicators, defined by GRI and AA1000AS, focuses on management issues that have socio-environmental and financial impacts, (internal factors) and on the views of stakeholders on the performance of the organization. Any particular material issue can influence the decision-making, actions and performance of an organization or of its stakeholders.
In 2008 Itaú incorporated an evaluation of material issues into the creation of the sustainability report. This process was based on mapping stakeholders as a result of the AA1000 implementation process. The result of the test substantially influenced the preparation of this report and confirmed that the main issues considered priorities by the stakeholders and by the company’s sustainability strategy are included in the management processes. Compliance with leading standards and commitments such as the Equator Principles, Dow Jones Sustainability Index, Bovespa Corporate Sustainability Index, the Carbon Disclosure Project and the recent adoption of SA8000, provide an advanced management structure that – combined with the processes of engagement with customers, suppliers and staff - ensures broad coverage of a financial institution’s key sustainability issues.
However, important issues for the general public, such as rates and fees, are still dealt with reactively. A first initiative to meet this demand is booklets about the conscientious use of credit, but there is a greater demand for positioning in today’s economic environment, which is overshadowed by the global financial crisis.
Response capacity
The principle of response capacity covers the organization’s actions, decisions and communications with stakeholders, carried out according to their specific demands. The principle points to the existence of decision-making processes that provide timely, valid answers, which is the company’s response capacity to sustainability challenges.
The bank has demonstrated the ability to meet goals and commitments identified in its engagement process with stakeholders. The subject of training security personnel in human rights, raised in previous audits, was treated substantially, with an awareness campaign provided to all service providers. The adherence of the call centres to the new service law was carried out on time and accompanied by internal monitoring. Accessibility improvements, such as energy management in buildings, showed progress. In the area of socio-environmental policies for credit the company is still on target. We recommend they place further emphasis on including other risk sectors and projects for socio-environmental analysis.
Summary
In the reporting period the process of engagement with Banco Itaú Holding Financeira S.A.’s stakeholders showed progress in its implementation. The achievement level of commitments and targets was very high, and the response level to critical issues and transparency of the report increased significantly. Based on the new Sustainability Policy and on a more consolidated engagement process, Itaú Unibanco has the opportunity to raise its level of managerial excellence in sustainability, including a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to the principal demands of its stakeholders.
São Paulo, March 24, 2009.
BSD Consulting
Beat Grüninger, Associate Sustainability Assurance Practitioner
Irca n.º 1189266
Corporate Information
Head Office
Praça Alfredo Egydio de Souza Aranha, 100
Torre Itaúsa
CEP 04344-902 – São Paulo – SP
Investor Relations Services
Praça Alfredo Egydio de Souza Aranha, 100
Torre Conceição – 11.º Andar
CEP 04344-902 – São Paulo – SP
E-mail: relacoes.investidores@itau.com.br
www.itauunibancori.com.br
Stockholder Services
Belo Horizonte – MG
Av. João Pinheiro, 195 – Térreo
CEP 30130-180
Brasília – DF
SCS Quadra 3 – Ed. Dona Angela
Sobreloja CEP 70300-500
Curitiba – PR
Rua João Negrão, 65 – Sobreloja
CEP 80010-200
Porto Alegre – RS
Rua Sete de Setembro, 746 – Térreo
CEP 90010-190
Rio de Janeiro – RJ
Rua Sete de Setembro, 99 – Subsolo
CEP 20050-005
Salvador – BA
Av. Estados Unidos, 50 – 2.º andar
Ed.Sesquicentenário
CEP 40010-020
São Paulo – SP
Rua XV de Novembro, 318 – Térreo
CEP 01013-001
Itaú Customer Services
SAC – 0800 728 0728
24 hours a day, 7 days a week
Fale Conosco (Contact Us)
www.itau.com.br
Corporate Ombudsman – 0800 570 0011 weekdays from 9:00 am to 6:00 pm
Caixa Postal n.º 67.600 – CEP 03162-971
Clients with hearing disabilities
0800 722 2808
24 hours a day, 7 days a week
Itaú Bankline
www.itau.com.br
Unibanco Customer Services
Telephone 30 HORAS
Main cities and metropolitan regions
4002 0030
Other locations – 0800 722 3030
www.unibanco.com.br
SAC – 0800 726 1809
Ombudsman – 0800 722 6281
Clients with hearing disabilities
0800 722 2808
Uniclass Customer Services
Main cities and metropolitan regions
4002 0030
Other locations – 0800 722 3030
www.uniclass.com.br
SAC – 0800 726 1809
Ombudsman – 0800 722 6281
Clients with hearing disabilities
0800 722 2808
Credits
Publication and Overall Coordination: Itaú Unibanco Banco Múltiplo S.A.
Editorial Coordination: Report Comunicação
Editorial and Graphic Design: Report Design
Translation: Montreal Consultants
Revision: Assertiva Produções Editoriais
Photos: Pisco Del Gaiso; Itaú and Unibanco archives; Cia de Foto; image bank and Studio Fábio Nunes.
Itaú Unibanco Banco Múltiplo S.A.
Praça Alfredo Egydio de Souza Aranha, 100
Torre Itaúsa – CEP 04344-902 – São Paulo – SP
If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, or would like more copies of the Report, please e-mail us at sustentabilidade@itau.com.br or sustentabilidade@unibanco.com.br
Our special thanks to everyone who authorized the use of their image, and to all staff members who helped create this Report.

